1. Initial screening
The submission is checked for completeness, fit, basic quality, and potential policy concerns before formal evaluation.
Editorial standards
Peer Review at ResearchUSA
Our review process is designed to strengthen submitted work, support academic integrity, and help readers discover credible research.
2. Expert evaluation
Qualified reviewers assess the work’s clarity, methods, evidence, originality, significance, and reproducibility.
3. Editorial decision
The evaluation supports a decision to approve, reject, or request revisions. Authors receive actionable feedback when available.
4. Publication record
Approved work is prepared for publication with its authorship, metadata, category, and publication date.
For authors
- • Submit original work and identify authors and sources accurately.
- • Describe methods, evidence, limitations, and conflicts transparently.
- • Respond to revision requests carefully and explain material changes.
- • Keep the manuscript file and profile information current.
For reviewers
- • Evaluate the work fairly, independently, and within your expertise.
- • Keep unpublished material and review details confidential.
- • Disclose conflicts and decline reviews when impartiality is affected.
- • Provide specific, respectful, and constructive feedback.
Ready to share your research?
Prepare your manuscript and supporting information, then begin a submission when you are ready.